(July 23, 2015)
Reading
the clear doctrine of the Atonement (why it was needed, and how it was
accomplished) serves to really highlight just how much our post-modern society
can put blinders on us. C. S. Lewis once
said that it is important to read the book written in the past because the
books of our day are all blind to the same things, and while the authors of the
past have their own blindness they are also able to see what we cannot.
Many of
the post-moderns would read about the necessity of the Atonement and come to
the same concern – that being that if God was all powerful he ought to be able
to save everyone regardless of whether or not they repent. That He does not, to many of them, is just a
demonstration to them of the foolishness of religion.
But
they cannot see their own blind spots in this.
Who are we to say that an all-powerful God would necessarily want to
save everyone (over their objections) even if He had the capacity? Doing so
would destroy the ends of Creation, and it would make God superfluous.
If I
can make a tenuous corollary here, I am reminded of ‘God Mode’ on some video
games. In this mode, you take no damage
and have unlimited ammunition and similar mechanisms that removes all the
challenge from the game. Games such as
these are games that I would play for a few moments, but they quickly became
boring and pointless.
If God
could save everyone with a waive of His Hand, would not His life become equally
as pointless? Instead, however, God has grand
ambitions for us that requires not only His indispensible effort and help but
also our exercise of agency. All of the
postmodern philosophy in the world cannot escape that.
No comments:
Post a Comment