(August 13, 2015)
There
were a couple of thoughts that came to my mind as I read through these
chapters. The first of those thoughts
focused on the idea that gain is godliness.
This isn’t just limited to material wealth, of course. We may think that popularity is godliness (if
everyone thinks I am righteous, then I am – I am living through the reverse of
that currently). Or if I think I am
godly, I am (pride).
We may
even be guilty of idolatry in the way that we approach our Priesthood
leaders. We must respect the office of
their calling, but so many times it seems like we assume that our leaders are
always godly (and the greater the leadership position, the greater the
godliness). We forget that we are
infallible people trying to run a perfect organization, and there is nothing that
would indicate that the Bishop by definition would be more godly than the
Nursery Leader (or any other two callings for comparison). I assume that the
same could be true for leaders believing themselves godly because of their
calling, but having never truly been in a leadership position, I would only be
speculating.
Ultimately
there is only one qualification for godliness – are you repenting and are you
forgiving. Everything else is sophistry meant
to distract us from the truth.
The
second thought was on the oppositions of science falsely called. We living in an age where scientism is a
religion, and its high priests openly advocate poor or false science to push
forward political, moral, or social agendas.
It is tempting to think that this is a unique situation (or a worse
situation) than any time before, but Paul’s words here seem to indicate that
isn’t true. And, in fact, that is a
common temptation (to believe our time is particularly bad, or particularly
good), but very rarely to we ever live in the best of times or the worst of
times.
No comments:
Post a Comment