(December 2, 2014)
I had
an interesting thought while reading these chapters, and I wanted to explore it
– not because I know it to be true but because it is interesting enough that I
want to see whether I think it is true. We don’t necessarily know the full mechanisms
behind the Fall, but we see all sorts of evidences of them. For example, entropy really seems to be a good
corollary of the Fall.
But I
am wondering if the Fall, ultimately, was a temporary breach in the Law of
Restitution or the Law of the Harvest. Evil
can (temporarily) benefit in mortality, whereas it never can in eternity. When we are good in mortality, we sometimes
don’t see the benefits of that goodness (not that we should be good for the
benefits) during our lifetime. For this
brief window of time, the Law of Restitution is not firmly applicable to our
lives – to the extent it is applicable, it is often delayed.
This is
the challenge that President Kimball and President Benson both alluded to, and
it seems to be a unique condition to mortality.
What little we know about the hereafter, and the time before the Fall,
seem to indicate that at those times this Law was perfectly in force.
No comments:
Post a Comment