(May 14, 2015)
Once again,
my mind is drawn to our own willful blindness when it comes to leaders. The political (and religious) leadership at
this time was willfully leading the people astray to maximize their own power
and authority, and they brought down destruction on the heads of those who
followed them. Basic economic theory
postulates that any position that offers disproportionate power over others
will attract a greater than average percentage of those who seek for such
power. That isn’t to say that all
politicians are power-hungry, but just to say that more politicians are
power-hungry than the percentage of power-hungry people in the general
population.
What,
then, about the Church? After all, the
leaders of this time were both religious and political leaders. Here, I believe, is the great benefit of the
lay ministry. While there are
undoubtedly those leaders in the Church who exercise unrighteous dominion (and
we shouldn’t be surprised that most will, at some point and to some degree),
the fact that we have a lay ministry comprised of leaders chosen (rather than
those who chose themselves) will inevitably lead to – at worst – a composition
of people proportional with the general population (which represents an
improvement over the political arena).
Throw in the facts that those with propensities toward unrighteous
dominion can be weeded out, and the fact that the Church teaches and inspires
selfless service, and so forth and you are left with a ministry that, while
imperfect, gives every indication that it is structurally better than the
general population. There may be bad
apples, but as far as systems go it clearly shows the Divine inspiration behind
it.
No comments:
Post a Comment