(September 1, 2014)
As I
read this chapter, I was again drawn to wonder why it was that the priests of
Noah felt compelled to kill Abinidi. Surely
they, like Alma ,
understood that Abinidi was a righteous prophet. After all, he had the power of God sufficient
to preclude them from slaying him until the time came that he had delivered his
message. Were I in their shoes, I would
have been given pause before I killed the man calling me to repentance and who
I could not kill.
But I
think it goes to highlight a common point that is sometimes lost – unfaithfulness
is frequently a choice rather than a condition. That is the only reason a lack of faith could
be a moral weakness – if we lack faith because of our choice. I don’t say this out of a rational theory, but
rather because I was in that position – I have chosen to believe, and there was
a time that I chose to disbelieve because of my sins. I recognize that my current faith is a choice.
That
doesn’t mean that I worry about confirmation bias or whether or not I truly
believe. After all, since my choice to
believe, I have had that faith confirmed countless times (more than what would
be necessary). But it wasn’t until I
chose to believe that I was open to the communication from the Lord. Apparently the priests of Noah had become so
wicked that they would be given that communication whether they were open to it
or not. Whereas we reject His message
through ignoring promptings, they explicitly rejected the message of His
prophets. But having been on both sides
of that coin, I recognize that they are really the same thing. When we ignore the whisperings of the Spirit,
we are doing little different (certainly not in quality, even if in quantity)
than what the priests of Noah did. And
that should worry us.
No comments:
Post a Comment